Yesterday I almost lost Xia. A large black car went zooming past her in a parking lot with all the intention and threat of running her over. This happen at a parking lot beside KL Convention Centre. It could have been accidental, but attempts on ones life in the context of having the Serial Killer of Manukau Counties NZ Police district as its proponent always seems.
 |
| KL Convention Centre (Aquaria building) |
I do not consider a corruption being the normal day to day activities of say the NZ Police, but consider corruption to be something of mind such as when a serial killer is allowed to project his serial killing without censure and when the power of that serial killer stems from his position, a position easily filled by someone more like those of the other police districts in NZ.
In an earlier blog entry I wrote of a NZ judiciary that seems heavily favoring a serial killer and terrorist, a position that suits the NZ Police. I was tempted to say that the judiciary is actually corrupt but declined and only hinted at this possibility.
Now, as time has invariably progressed, these indications, the needles on all those compasses, are tilting further into a conviction.
The CIMB case is supported by innumerable credible people, people from the class of normal citizenry to those that actually consist of government in Malaysia. These include judges, Datuks, neighbors, schools, businesses and others. All witness to terrorist attacks by the NZ Police, commanded by Serial Killer.
The NZ judiciary has had ample time to verify the merits of the case since it has been almost two months within their study and courts. On the one hand the CIMB case is faultless and true in all respects, on the other the NZ Police case has been based on falsifications, threats, attempted murders, diversions, nonsensical arguments and deception as well as not an inconsiderable smoke-screen.
The case also has very serious charges, one of terrorism, murder and serial killing - both in Manukau Counties and in Malaysia. It is not one of simple misconduct but has deeper implications as to the state of mind of NZ law.
As the case wonders on this endless quest for completion, there are real lives that hang in the balance. There are the lives of my whole family. One member who at four was almost killed via rape by a herpes infected man, one member who at nine was kidnapped for use as a slave for the purposes of a violent gang, one member who is even now being held as a slave in a game which has seen her raped and impregnated by three men as well as had numerous attempts on her life, myself been subjected to attempted murders and the victim of a serial killer's lust for his and his wife's source of pleasure.
The murder weapons are all used unabated.
There is the economic knife which has now depleted even our food stores.
There is the violent gangs (including that of the super powered serial killers that armors Serial Killer's intent) which almost took my daughters life yesterday and continues its terrorist regime with all that fall in the way of Serial Killer's serial killing.
There is Serial Killer's continued command and control over NZ Police's considerable resources.
And there is a judiciary that seems happy to accept any argument by the NZ Police to delay the case, as if to await a time when the case would simply fizzle out.
Meanwhile there is this thing going around that there has been abatement. It says that abatement means that Serial Killer can maintain all his powers but must be circumspect in its use - as long as no one sees it continuously happening to other people apart from the subject (or from a serial killer perspective - the object) of his serial killing.
In all this time there has not once been an attempt by the courts, with their resources, to verify the large numbers of murders in Manukau attributable directly to Serial Killer, let alone provide an outcome to the case. They well know that time is short on the victims side but infinite for Serial Killer. By sitting on the case they know it will simply go away and that appears to be their considered position. By sitting on the case they think their face will remain clean.
Silence by a judiciary in a non-random universe is also an information.
This paragraph from here:
"Parliament passes laws that represent policy decisions which reflect the intention or interests of New Zealanders collectively"
I don't think I am being naive to assume that the Crimes Act 1961: s62, 68,78A, 98, 98AA, 100, 107,108-113, 115-117, 145, 155-157, 158-166,167-179,188-197,200-204,216A-F,229,248-250,306-308,310-312,312A-312CD does not apply to a serial killer in the context of a senior NZ Police officer for Manukau Counties NZ Police district.
No comments:
Post a Comment